Moderador: Damned Martian
castigador escribió:Lo peor de la pelicula es sin duda el final, han destruido total y completamente la linea argumental con alien el octavo pasajero, todo lo demas se puede pasar, pero ¿en que cabeza cabe cargarse el momento en el que descubren el cadaver del piloto en el puente de mando con el pecho abierto?, aqui el piloto muere donde no toca, porque si y sin mas, el periodo de "incubacion" es instantaneo y ademas el alien sale crecido ya, una supuesta reina que ya no pondra los huevos en la nave que años mas tarde descubriran Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) y sus compañeros.
Que se ha fumado ridley scott para cargarse la union con la pelicula que dirigio hace años?, flipante.
MrFloppy escribió:PD: Si a alguien le interesa ese artículo de preguntas sin respuesta:
http://www.hitfix.com/motion-captured/p ... -questions
Y de donde vienen todas esas ideas religiosas: http://cavalorn.livejournal.com/584135.html (MUY interesante).
Miniviciao@ escribió:Floopy esta imagen del trailer q en la peli se ve mucho mas grande y con mas luz , se ve el grabado entero, no te parece el esbozo de la escena final, como el alien primitivo q sale del space jockey y del hibrido, a mi me lo parecio
MrFloppy escribió:Miniviciao@ escribió:Floopy esta imagen del trailer q en la peli se ve mucho mas grande y con mas luz , se ve el grabado entero, no te parece el esbozo de la escena final, como el alien primitivo q sale del space jockey y del hibrido, a mi me lo parecio
Sin duda alguna... Si has leído esos dos artículos, habrás comprobado la de referencias que repite a la imagen original de Prometeo con el hígado abierto...
Lo que me pregunto entonces es que, la creación del xenomorfo no es un accidente causado al "cruzarlo" con la raza humana, no? Entiendo que los Ingenieros iban a usarlo contra nosotros, sabían perfectamente lo que había. De ahí que ese grabado ya exista...
Why do Weyland, Vickers and their staff not react at all to a bloody Shaw coming into their quarters?
OUR TAKE: This is the beginning of a whole stretch of film where no one behaves the way we'd expect people to behave faced with these circumstances. Yes, it's a big deal that they're waking up Weyland, but when a half-nude woman covered in blood with a fresh surgical incision comes stumbling into a room, you would expect people to react. Nothing. Not even the slightest hint that this might be out of the ordinary.
Why doesn't Shaw tell everyone about the seemingly frozen alien in the surgery machine so they get it off the ship?
OUR TAKE: David knows full well what happened in the surgery machine. His comment to her, "I didn't know you had it in you," in a non-too-subtle jab at Shaw, but he seems completely uninterested in following up at all, even if he's the one who started that particular ball in motion. Even when he's got Weyland to contend with, it would seem like David could find five extra minutes to walk over, check out the still-very-much-alive creature that he knows was inside Shaw, and decide what to do with it.
Again… this last act of the film depends largely on people doing things that no one would actually do. It's all in service to the plot, not in service to good character writing. The characters in this part of the movie are almost exactly as smart as the teenagers in a typical "Friday the 13th" film, and for the same precise reason.
Is David evil? Why does he want to put Shaw - who never was mean to him like Holloway - into stasis with the alien in her instead of getting it out?
OUR TAKE: I don't think "evil" plays into it at all. David is simply dispassionate, utterly without empathy. When he contaminates Holloway, he's careful to first ask him for what David reads as permission first. When he realizes what's happening, David decides that studying the thing growing inside her is more important than any human compassion. Shaw is simply a subject to be studied, not a friend or a peer. It's just a matter of curiosity for him.
Of course, he's not curious enough to take two minutes to examine the thing once he learns Shaw cut it out of herself, but he's curious, nonetheless. David is fascinated by the Engineers, determined to see them close-up and at work, and he wants to see what their technology can do. He has already determined that humans hold him in a specific kind of contempt, expressed most clearly through Holloway's behavior, but in general, he feels no obligation to protect them. It's a safe bet that Asimov's laws of robotics do not apply in the world of "Prometheus."
Based on the seemingly pointless presence of Patrick Wilson, do we assume that Shaw's deceased father has a greater importance of some sort?
OUR TAKE: That is a strange and distracting bit of casting considering how little he's in the film, just as it's a strange choice to have Guy Pearce buried under truly awful old-age make-up when it would have made more sense just to hire an old guy. It's not like Pearce does anything in the film that an older actor couldn't. Wilson's fine in his scene, but it does make us wonder if Shaw had more flashbacks that were cut for time, because Wilson seems to bring unnecessary star power to a two-minute role.
gejorsnake escribió:
-Donde está el trabajo de Giger y tdoo ese "universo biomecánico" ? Se supone que la nave está viva ,todo reaccionaría de una forma compleja y solo lo vemos cuando el ingeniero se sienta en el "cañón" de la nave y en los murales cambiantes.Se podían haber ahorrado contratar a Giger y todo esa publicidad que se dieron presumiendo de su participación.
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: No hay usuarios registrados visitando el Foro y 7 invitados
Nuestros Top 10
Están de moda...
Últimos Trailers
CINeol Desde 2003 - Todos los Derechos Reservados.
Legal | Créditos | Publicidad | Contacta